Behavioral Sciences & the Law

Skip to Search

Skip to Navigation

Volume 24 Issue 4 (July/August 2006), Pages 409-628

Introduction to this issue: capacity to consent: a snapshot of contemporary legal and clinical issues (pages 409-409)

  • John Petrila
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.723

Capacity to consent to or refuse treatment and/or research: theoretical considerations (pages 411-429)

  • Elyn R. Saks, Dilip V. Jeste
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.708

Capacity to consent to research in schizophrenia: the expanding evidence base (pages 431-445)

  • Laura B. Dunn
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.698

Informed consent for schizophrenia research: what is an investigator (or IRB) to do? (pages 447-452)

  • Barton W. Palmer
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.695

Declining medical decision‐making capacity in mild AD: a two‐year longitudinal study (pages 453-463)

  • Justin S. Huthwaite, Roy C. Martin, H. Randall Griffith, Britt Anderson, Lindy E. Harrell, Daniel C. Marson
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.701

Cognitive capacities of older adults who are asked to consent to medical treatment or to clinical research (pages 465-468)

  • Margaret Gatz
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.694

The capacity to appoint a proxy and the possibility of concurrent proxy directives (pages 469-478)

  • Scott Y. H. Kim, Paul S. Appelbaum
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.702

Can or should CAP be applied to child research subjects?: A comment on Kim and Appelbaum (pages 479-484)

  • Jan C. Costello
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.693

A therapeutic jurisprudence perspective on participation in research by subjects with reduced capacity to consent: a comment on Kim and Appelbaum (pages 485-494)

  • Bruce J. Winick, Kenneth W. Goodman
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.703

Involuntary treatment and competence to proceed in the criminal process: capital and noncapital cases (pages 495-528)

  • Robert F. Schopp
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.704

Competency in the criminal context: an analysis of Robert Schopp's views (pages 529-534)

  • Christopher Slobogin
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.697

The therapeutic misconception and our models of competency and informed consent (pages 535-546)

  • Charles W. Lidz
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.700

Commentary on “TM and our models of informed consent” by Charles W. Lidz (pages 547-552)

  • Anthony Charuvastra, Stephen Marder
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.692

Enhancing the informed consent process: a conceptual overview (pages 553-568)

  • Lisa T. Eyler, Dilip V. Jeste
  • Published: 16 May 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.691

Commentary on eyler and jeste: practical issues in consent capacity and mental disorders (pages 569-572)

  • David Shore, Pamela Hayes Shell, Christine Moretto Wishnoff
  • Published: 16 May 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.690

Rotting with their rights on: why the criteria for ending commitment or restraint of liberty need not be the same as the criteria for initiating commitment or restraint of liberty, and how the restraint may sometimes justifiably continue after its prerequisites are no longer satisfied (pages 573-598)

  • Ken Kress
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.709

Steel traps and unattainable aspirations: a comment on Kress (pages 599-606)

  • Stephen J. Morse
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.696

Decisional capacity in mental illness and substance use disorders: empirical database and policy implications (pages 607-628)

  • Dilip V. Jeste,, Elyn Saks,
  • Published: 02 Aug 2006
  • DOI: 10.1002/bsl.707

EBSCO Discovery Service - Click here to find out about unified searching of BPS/Wiley Journals Click here to access (BPS members only)

Add This link

Bookmark and Share>