Applied Cognitive Psychology

Skip to Search

Skip to Navigation

Early View Articles

Understanding the weapon focus effect: The role of threat, unusualness, exposure duration, and scene complexity

  • Jamal K. Mansour, Claire M. Hamilton, Matthew T. Gibson
  • Published: 14 Feb 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3515

Using the Reality Interview improves the accuracy of the Criteria‐Based Content Analysis and Reality Monitoring

  • Glynis Bogaard, Kevin Colwell, Samantha Crans
  • Published: 04 Mar 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3537

Using the model statement to elicit verbal differences between truth tellers and liars amongst Arab interviewees: A partial replication of Leal, Vrij, Deeb, and Jupe (2018)

  • Sharon Leal, Aldert Vrij, Zarah Vernham, Gary Dalton, Louise Marie Jupe, Galit Nahari, Nir Rozmann
  • Published: 14 Mar 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3536

Judging credibility: Can spaced lessons help students think more critically online?

  • Vanessa Foot‐Seymour, June Foot, Melody Wiseheart
  • Published: 14 Mar 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3539

Autobiographical memory and autobiographical narrative of a staged event: The influence of the listener

  • Benedetta Elmi, Eleonora Bartoli, Andrea Smorti
  • Published: 02 Apr 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3540

The roles of meaningfulness and prior knowledge in younger and older adults' memory performance

  • Donald J. Skinner, Jodi Price
  • Published: 10 Apr 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3552

A method for increasing empirical discriminability and eliminating top‐row preference in photo arrays

  • Curt A. Carlson, Alyssa R. Jones, Charles A. Goodsell, Maria A. Carlson, Dawn R. Weatherford, Jane E. Whittington, Robert F. Lockamyeir
  • Published: 10 Apr 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3551

An examination of the potential lingering effects of smartphone use on cognition

  • Peter Frost, Patrick Donahue, Keith Goeben, Megan Connor, Hoong Sing Cheong, Aaron Schroeder
  • Published: 10 Apr 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3546

Working memory and second language accent acquisition

  • Sven L. Mattys, Alan Baddeley
  • Published: 10 Apr 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3554

Learning to calibrate: Providing standards to improve calibration accuracy for different performance levels

  • Marloes L. Nederhand, Huib K. Tabbers, Remy M.J.P. Rikers
  • Published: 10 Apr 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3548

Biased recipients encounter biased sources: Effect of ethical (dis‐)agreement between recipient and author on evaluating scientific claims

  • Lisa Scharrer, Marc Stadtler, Rainer Bromme
  • Published: 30 Apr 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3563

Understanding the past: Investigating the role of availability, outcome, and hindsight bias and close calls in visual pilots' weather‐related decision making

  • Stephen Walmsley, Andrew Gilbey
  • Published: 09 May 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3557

Does text–picture integration also occur with longer text segments?

  • Anne Schüler, Jana Arndt, Katharina Scheiter
  • Published: 14 May 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3558

Information leakage in the Response Time‐Based Concealed Information Test

  • Gáspár Lukács, Ulrich Ansorge
  • Published: 20 May 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3565

How generative drawing affects the learning process: An eye‐tracking analysis

  • Johannes Hellenbrand, Richard E. Mayer, Maria Opfermann, Annett Schmeck, Detlev Leutner
  • Published: 23 May 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3559

The Self‐Administered Witness Interview Tool (SAW‐IT): Enhancing witness recall of workplace incidents

  • Carla L. MacLean, Fiona Gabbert, Lorraine Hope
  • Published: 24 May 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3568

Eliciting information and cues to deceit through sketching in interpreter‐based interviews

  • Aldert Vrij, Sharon Leal, Ronald P. Fisher, Samantha Mann, Eunkyung Jo, Alla Shaboltas, Maria Khaleeva, Juliana Granskaya, Kate Houston
  • Published: 24 May 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3566

Deceiving suspects about their alibi is equally harmful to the innocent and guilty

  • Melanie Sauerland, Alana C. Krix, Anna Sagana
  • Published: 26 May 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3577

The “analysis of competing hypotheses” in intelligence analysis

  • Mandeep K. Dhami, Ian K. Belton, David R. Mandel
  • Published: 30 May 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3550

The feasibility of working memory tablet tasks in predicting scholastic skills in classroom settings

  • Kaisa Kanerva, Ilkka Kiistala, Virpi Kalakoski, Riikka Hirvonen, Timo Ahonen, Noona Kiuru
  • Published: 09 Jun 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3569

Non‐blind lineup administration biases administrators' interpretations of ambiguous witness statements and their perceptions of the witness

  • Steve D. Charman, Kureva Matuku, Alexis Mook
  • Published: 17 Jun 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3579

My family matters: Past and future life stories in adolescents with refugee background

  • Stine Breum Ramsgaard, Annette Bohn
  • Published: 25 Jun 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3578

The generality of belief in unsubstantiated claims

  • D. Alan Bensley, Scott O. Lilienfeld, Krystal A. Rowan, Christopher M. Masciocchi, Florent Grain
  • Published: 01 Jul 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3581

Cognitive consequences of playing brain‐training games in immersive virtual reality

  • Jocelyn Parong, Richard E. Mayer
  • Published: 01 Jul 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3582

Age differences in life stories and neuroticism mediate age differences in subjective well‐being

  • Rikke A.A. Jensen, Dorthe Kirkegaard Thomsen, Maja O'Connor, Mimi Y. Mehlsen
  • Published: 04 Jul 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3580

Tracking the identity of moving words: Stimulus complexity and familiarity affects tracking accuracy

  • Jukka Hyönä, Lauri Oksama, Esa Rantanen
  • Published: 18 Jul 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3589

Image‐size disparity reduces difference detection in face matching

  • Robin F. Hopkins, Keith B. Lyle
  • Published: 18 Jul 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3586

Examining the effects of frustration on working memory capacity

  • Jonathan Parks Fillauer, Jennifer Bolden, Melanie Jacobson, Brock H. Partlow, Andrea Benavides, Jessica N. Shultz
  • Published: 23 Jul 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3587

Cognitive testing of an instrument to evaluate acceptability and use of pre‐exposure prophylaxis products among women

  • Seth Zissette, Millicent Atujuna, Elizabeth E. Tolley, Eunice Okumu, Judith D. Auerbach, Sally L. Hodder, Sevgi O. Aral, Adaora A. Adimora
  • Published: 23 Jul 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3590

Prosody instruction intervention as a means to improved reading comprehension

  • Marilyn Petro, Rick Cypert
  • Published: 02 Aug 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3593

Why should we try to think like scientists? Scientific reasoning and susceptibility to epistemically suspect beliefs and cognitive biases

  • Vladimíra Čavojová, Jakub Šrol, Marek Jurkovič
  • Published: 05 Aug 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3595

A model statement does not  enhance the verifiability approach

  • Glynis Bogaard, Ewout H. Meijer, Irina Van der Plas
  • Published: 06 Aug 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3596

Perceptual representation of spam and phishing emails

  • Pooja Patel, Dawn M. Sarno, Joanna E. Lewis, Mindy Shoss, Mark B. Neider, Corey J. Bohil
  • Published: 08 Aug 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3594

Asking an eyewitness to predict their later lineup performance could harm the confidence–accuracy relationship

  • Jane E. Whittington, Curt A. Carlson, Maria A. Carlson, Dawn R. Weatherford, Lacy E. Krueger, Alyssa R. Jones
  • Published: 14 Aug 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3599

Memory distortions: When suggestions cannot be easily ignored

  • Donna Gift Cabalo, Francesco Ianì, A. Reyyan Bilge, Giuliana Mazzoni
  • Published: 14 Aug 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3597

Am I guilty or not? Deontological guilt, uncertainty, and checking behavior

  • Mauro Giacomantonio, Marco Salvati, Francesco Mancini
  • Published: 19 Aug 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3600

The power of technology, Examining the effects of digital visual evidence on jurors' processing of trial information

  • Emma Rempel, Leah Hamovitch, Lesley Zannella, Tara M. Burke
  • Published: 19 Aug 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3598

Analysing openly recorded preinterview deliberations to detect deceit in collective interviews

  • Aldert Vrij, Louise Marie Jupe, Sharon Leal, Zarah Vernham, Galit Nahari
  • Published: 26 Aug 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3601

Absolute and Relative Decision Processes in Eyewitness Identification

  • Molly B. Moreland, Steven E. Clark
  • Published: 26 Aug 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3602

Did you wash your hands? Evaluating memory for objects touched by healthy individuals and individuals with contagious and noncontagious diseases

  • Matthew R. Gretz, Mark J. Huff
  • Published: 13 Sep 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3604

Mock juror's perceptions of a child witness passing or failing a truth and lies discussion or promising to tell the truth

  • Felicity O'Connell, Julie Cherryman, Lara Warmelink
  • Published: 28 Oct 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3612

Putting a negative spin on it: Using a fidget spinner can impair memory for a video lecture

  • Benjamin C. Storm, Julia S. Soares
  • Published: 29 Oct 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3610

No evidence of other‐race effect for Chinese faces in Malaysian non‐Chinese population

  • Alejandro J. Estudillo, Jasmine Kar Wye Lee, Neil Mennie, Edwin Burns
  • Published: 06 Nov 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3609

The influence of an emotional processing strategy on visual threat detection by police trainees and officers

  • Alexandre Williot, Isabelle Blanchette
  • Published: 12 Nov 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3616

Frequent mastery testing with second‐chance exams leads to enhanced student learning in undergraduate engineering

  • Jason W. Morphew, Mariana Silva, Geoffrey Herman, Matthew West
  • Published: 28 Oct 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3605

Anxiety after remembering stressful academic versus brush with death events: The moderating roles of future time perspective and personal intimacy

  • Hsiao‐Wen Liao, Susan Bluck
  • Published: 06 Nov 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3613

Investigation of collaborative inhibition for key‐term definitions

  • Kathryn T. Wissman
  • Published: 06 Nov 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3606

The prevalence of declarative and indirect yes/no Questions when children testify in criminal cases of child sexual abuse in the United States

  • Stacia N. Stolzenberg, Stephanie J. Morse, Danielle L. Haverkate, Anastacia M. Garcia‐Johnson
  • Published: 28 Oct 2019
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3607

ROCs in Eyewitness Identification: Instructions versus Confidence Ratings

  • Laura Mickes, Travis M. Seale‐Carlisle, Stacy A. Wetmore, Scott D. Gronlund, Steven E. Clark, Curt A. Carlson, Charles A. Goodsell, Dawn Weatherford, John T. Wixted
  • Published: 03 Aug 2017
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3344

Visuospatial counter‐interrogation strategies by liars familiar with the alibi setting

  • Haneen Deeb, Pär Anders Granhag, Aldert Vrij, Leif A. Strömwall, Lorraine Hope, Samantha Mann
  • Published: 14 Jan 2018
  • DOI: 10.1002/acp.3383

EBSCO Discovery Service - Click here to find out about unified searching of BPS/Wiley Journals Click here to access (BPS members only)

Add This link

Bookmark and Share>