Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

Skip to Search

Skip to Navigation

Early View Articles

“To hope was to expect”: The impact of perspective taking and forecast type on wishful thinking

  • Olivia Aspiras, Jason P. Rose
  • Published: 10 Jan 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2170

Anxiety‐induced miscalculations, more than differential inhibition of intuition, explain the gender gap in cognitive reflection

  • Marie Juanchich, Miroslav Sirota, Jean‐François Bonnefon
  • Published: 13 Jan 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2165

Arbitrary social comparison, malicious envy, and generosity

  • Adiel Moyal, Marina Motsenok, Ilana Ritov
  • Published: 15 Jan 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2172

Roles of cognitive load and self‐relevance during emotional information searching on decision‐making

  • Meijia Li, Huamao Peng, Lingling Ji
  • Published: 16 Jan 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2169

Does betrayal aversion really guide trust decisions towards strangers?

  • Detlef Fetchenhauer, Anne‐Sophie Lang, Daniel Ehlebracht, Thomas Schlösser, David Dunning
  • Published: 24 Jan 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2166

Take a risk or proceed with caution: Prevention motivation moderates responses to near‐loss events

  • Jill W. Paine, Florian Federspiel, Matthias Seifert, Xi Zou
  • Published: 05 Feb 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2174

Rivals without a cause? Relative performance feedback creates destructive competition despite aligned incentives

  • Jan K. Woike, Sebastian Hafenbrädl
  • Published: 13 Feb 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2162

Thinking about decisions: An integrative approach of person and task factors

  • Todd McElroy, David L. Dickinson, Irwin P. Levin
  • Published: 14 Feb 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2175

The association between risky decision making and attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms: A preregistered assessment of need for cognition as underlying mechanism

  • Hilde M. Huizenga, Tycho J. Dekkers, Jacqueline N. Zadelaar
  • Published: 26 Feb 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2177

Money does not stink: Using unpleasant odors as stimulus material changes risky decision making

  • Bettina Helversen, Géraldine Coppin, Benjamin Scheibehenne
  • Published: 23 Mar 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2178

How representations of number and numeracy predict decision paradoxes: A fuzzy‐trace theory approach

  • Valerie F. Reyna, Priscila G. Brust‐Renck
  • Published: 01 Apr 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2179

Decision‐making styles and mental health—A person‐oriented approach through clustering

  • Jozef Bavolar, Maria Bacikova‐Sleskova
  • Published: 28 Apr 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2183

The decision to check in multialternative choices and limited sensitivity to default

  • Yefim Roth
  • Published: 30 Apr 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2181

Illusory trust: Kanizsa shapes incidentally increase trust and willingness to invest

  • Thorsten M. Erle, Michael K. Zürn
  • Published: 12 May 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2184

Adding versus averaging: Evaluability theory applied to job choice decisions

  • Yalcin Acikgoz
  • Published: 15 May 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2186

What if I am the one? Measuring individual differences in emotional sensitivity to probability and emotional reactivity to possibility

  • Heather P. Lacey, Steven C. Lacey, Laura D. Scherer, Brian J. Zikmund‐Fisher
  • Published: 01 Jun 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2194

Honest mistake or perhaps not: The role of descriptive and injunctive norms on the magnitude of dishonesty

  • Giannis Lois, Michèle Wessa
  • Published: 24 Jun 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2196

The effect of perceived financial vulnerability on prosocial activity

  • Marina Motsenok, Ilana Ritov
  • Published: 25 Jun 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2198

Moral tribalism and its discontents: How intuitive theories of ethics shape consumers' deference to experts

  • David Tuckett, Max Rodrigues, Samuel G.B. Johnson
  • Published: 26 Jun 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2187

Timing of descriptions shapes experience‐based risky choice

  • Nigel Harvey, Emmanouil Konstantinidis, Leonardo Weiss‐Cohen
  • Published: 29 Jun 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2197

Components of attentional effort for repeated tasks

  • Andres Musalem, Ricardo Montoya, Martin Meißner, Joel Huber
  • Published: 06 Jul 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2188

American base‐rate neglect: It is not the math, but the context

  • Shali Wu, Clifton Emery
  • Published: 08 Jul 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2182

The influence of decision time on sensitivity for consequences, moral norms, and preferences for inaction: Time, moral judgments, and the CNI model

  • Meike Kroneisen, Sarah Steghaus
  • Published: 10 Jul 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2202

Behavior in cheating paradigms is linked to overall approval rates of crowdworkers

  • Ingo Zettler, Lau Lilleholt, Christoph Schild
  • Published: 16 Jul 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2195

Keeping them honest: Promises reduce cheating in adolescents

  • Patricia Kanngiesser, Jahnavi Sunderarajan, Jan K. Woike
  • Published: 23 Jul 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2203

Choosing what to choose from: Preference for inclusion over exclusion when constructing consideration sets from large choice sets

  • Rebecca Walker Reczek, Joseph K. Goodman
  • Published: 28 Jul 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2199

Leaving with something: When do people experience an equity–efficiency conflict?

  • Tom Gordon‐Hecker, Iris K. Schneider, Shaul Shalvi, Yoella Bereby‐Meyer
  • Published: 30 Jul 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2205

Dyadic judgments based on conflicting samples: The failure to ignore invalid input

  • Klaus Fiedler, Tobias Krüger, Alex Koch, Florian Kutzner
  • Published: 16 Jan 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2173

Inconsistencies in repeated refugee status decisions

  • Annika Wallin, Alexander Tagesson, Philip Pärnamets
  • Published: 26 Feb 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2176

The effect of imperfect memory recall on risk preferences

  • Rafał Muda, Paweł Niszczota, Paweł Augustynowicz
  • Published: 12 May 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2185

The heterogeneous processes of cheating: Attention evidence from two eye tracking experiments

  • Chris Street, Catrine Jacobsen, Toke Fosgaard
  • Published: 10 Jul 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2200

Preference or ability: Exploring the relations between risk preference, personality, and cognitive abilities

  • Philip Millroth, Peter Juslin, Anders Winman, Håkan Nilsson, Marcus Lindskog
  • Published: 16 Jan 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2171

Contextual framing of loss impacts harm avoidance during risky spatial decisions

  • Kevin Jarbo, David Colaço, Timothy Verstynen
  • Published: 13 May 2020
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2180

Strategy Selection Versus Strategy Blending: A Predictive Perspective on Single‐ and Multi‐Strategy Accounts in Multiple‐Cue Estimation

  • Stefan M. Herzog, Bettina Helversen
  • Published: 25 Apr 2016
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1958

Old and New Directions in Strategy Selection

  • Jerome R. Busemeyer
  • Published: 09 Mar 2017
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2005

Decision Making in Environments with Non‐Independent Dimensions

  • Sudeep Bhatia
  • Published: 01 Jun 2016
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1964

Modeling Between‐Subject Variability in Decision Strategies via Statistical Clustering: A p ‐Median Approach

  • Nicholas Brown, Sanghyuk Park, Douglas Steinley, Clintin P. Davis‐Stober
  • Published: 22 Apr 2016
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1957

On Narrow Norms of Rationality and Questionable Data Analyses: A Comment on Jekel and Glöckner

  • Jörg Rieskamp
  • Published: 26 Apr 2017
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2016

Causal Reasoning Under Ambiguity: An Illustration of Modeling Mixture Strategies

  • Yiyun Shou, Michael Smithson
  • Published: 02 Mar 2016
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1948

How to Identify Strategy Use and Adaptive Strategy Selection: The Crucial Role of Chance Correction in Weighted Compensatory Strategies

  • Marc Jekel, Andreas Glöckner
  • Published: 14 Oct 2016
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1983

A Dual‐Process Diffusion Model

  • Carlos Alós‐Ferrer
  • Published: 03 May 2016
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.1960

Are Decisions Made by Group Representatives More Risk Averse? The Effect of Sense of Responsibility

  • Zuo‐Jun Wang, Yi Kuang, Hui‐Yi Tang, Cong Gao, Ai Chen, Kai Qin Chan
  • Published: 27 Nov 2017
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2057

Suffering a Loss Is Good Fortune: Myth or Reality?

  • Cui‐Xia Zhao, Si‐Chu Shen, Li‐Lin Rao, Rui Zheng, Huan Liu, Shu Li
  • Published: 29 Nov 2017
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2056

Guiding Decision Makers' Eye Movements with (Un)Predictable Object Locations

  • Jacob L. Orquin, Nina Chrobot, Klaus G. Grunert
  • Published: 29 Nov 2017
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2060

A Systematic Scoping Review of the Choice Architecture Movement: Toward Understanding When and Why Nudges Work

  • Barnabas Szaszi, Anna Palinkas, Bence Palfi, Aba Szollosi, Balazs Aczel
  • Published: 04 Dec 2017
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2035

Learning to Decide with and without Reasoning: How Task Experience Affects Attribute Weighting and Preference Stability

  • Tuomas Leisti, Jukka Häkkinen
  • Published: 04 Dec 2017
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2063

Robustness of Decision‐Making Competence: Evidence from Two Measures and an 11‐Year Longitudinal Study

  • Andrew M. Parker, Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Baruch Fischhoff, Joshua Weller
  • Published: 06 Dec 2017
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2059

The Role of Attention in Attribute Framing

  • Hamutal Kreiner, Eyal Gamliel
  • Published: 07 Dec 2017
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2067

Maximizing Scales Do Not Reliably Predict Maximizing Behavior in Decisions from Experience

  • Jason L. Harman, Justin M. Weinhardt, Cleotilde Gonzalez
  • Published: 15 Dec 2017
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2070

Relating Decision‐Making Styles to Social Orientation and Time Approach

  • Martin Geisler, Carl Martin Allwood
  • Published: 19 Dec 2017
  • DOI: 10.1002/bdm.2066

EBSCO Discovery Service - Click here to find out about unified searching of BPS/Wiley Journals Click here to access (BPS members only)

Add This link

Bookmark and Share>