Philosophical Investigations

Skip to Search

Skip to Navigation

Volume 37 Issue 1 (January 2014), Pages 1-104

Inwardness and Sociability: A Reply to Carter (pages 57-77)


Carter argues that Wittgensteinian moral philosophy – typified by the work of Raimond Gaita and Christopher Cordner – rests on shaky foundations because it vacillates between grounding moral judgements in grammar and in a form of life. In this article, I respond to Carter's criticism. I defend Wittgensteinian moral philosophy by showing that Gaita and Cordner specifically repudiate the purported dichotomy between grammar and a form of life. I then go on to explain why Wittgensteinian moral philosophers are right not to try to ground moral judgements in features of a shared form of life.

Add This link

Bookmark and Share>